Rozier v. State

231 S.E.2d 131, 140 Ga. App. 356, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1472
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 5, 1976
Docket53030
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 231 S.E.2d 131 (Rozier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rozier v. State, 231 S.E.2d 131, 140 Ga. App. 356, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The accusation alleged that defendant "did without provocation use to and in the presence of..., a 16-year-old female,. .. abusive and profane language which he knew or should have known by their very utterance would tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace, said language being, to-wit: 'How about some pussy’?, said utterance being in violation of Georgia Code Section 26-2610.” Code § 26-2610 (a) provides: "A person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of a misdemeanor: (a) Without provocation, uses to or of another, in his presence, opprobrious or abusive words which by their very utterance tend to incite to an immediate breach of the peace; that is to say, words which as a matter of common knowledge and under ordinary circumstances will, when used to or of another person in his presence, naturally tend to provoke violent resentment, that is, words commonly called fighting words.” This statute is very plainly designed to punish "fighting words” which by their utterance tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. See Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U. S. 518 (92 SC 1103, 31 LE2d 408). The evidence by the state revealed that the defendant made this remark to the victim while the latter was at home with her five-year-old brother. This remark, when considered under the circumstances and in the context in which it was made, did not constitute "fighting words.” Thus, there was no violation of this statute.

Judgment reversed.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur. *357 Lane & Littlefield, Grayson P. Lane, for appellant. Delman L. Minchew, Solicitor, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lundgren v. State
518 S.E.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
State v. Klinakis
425 S.E.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Hershfield v. Commonwealth
417 S.E.2d 876 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1992)
Crolley v. State
354 S.E.2d 864 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Davis v. State
265 S.E.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 S.E.2d 131, 140 Ga. App. 356, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rozier-v-state-gactapp-1976.