Rozier v. State
171 S.E. 834, 48 Ga. App. 95, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 468
This text of 171 S.E. 834 (Rozier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rozier v. State, 171 S.E. 834, 48 Ga. App. 95, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 468 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
The evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial, and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. Therefore the verdict in favor of the State was unauthorized, and the court’s refusal to grant a new trial was error.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 S.E. 834, 48 Ga. App. 95, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rozier-v-state-gactapp-1933.