Rozier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rozier v. State

110 S.E. 747, 28 Ga. App. 229, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 412

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 14, 1922

Docket13176

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 747 (Rozier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rozier v. State, 110 S.E. 747, 28 Ga. App. 229, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. A ground of the motion for a new trial complains ot the admission of certain evidence over the objection of the deienciant and sets forth what the objection was, but does not state that this objection was interposed at the time of the offering or admission of the evidence. This ground is further defective in that it is not complete and understandable within itself.

2. The verdict was supported by some evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Indictment for sale of crop; from Lanrens superior court — Judge Kent. November 26, 1921.

W. C. Davis, for plaintiff in error. E. L. Stephens, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI