Rozier v. State
This text of 106 S.E. 815 (Rozier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The special ground of the motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence was properly overruled. A part of this evidence was impeaching in its nature; the remainder was cumulative and not of such character as would likely produce a different verdict should a new trial be granted. See Park’s Penal Code, § 1088, and citations under the catchwords “Cumulative,” “Impeaching,” pp. 752-3, 755.
2. The verdict is supported by evidence and has the approval of the trial judge, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.E. 815, 26 Ga. App. 622, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rozier-v-state-gactapp-1921.