Rozier v. State
626 So. 2d 342, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11650, 1993 WL 473154
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rozier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 636 So. 2d 1386 →
Opinion
We affirm the restitution ordered for expenses to cover the cost of the victim’s inpatient treatment. The restitution ordered for the travel expenses and lost wages of the mother of the victim are stricken, however. See Watson v. State, 579 So.2d 900 (Fla. 4th DCA1991); Cliburn v. State, 510 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA1987). We also strike the “state attorney’s fee.” E.g., Turkaly v. State, 615 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA1993).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rozier v. State, 626 So. 2d 342, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11650, 1993 WL 473154 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
626 So. 2d 342 (Rozier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Turkaly v. State
615 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Watson v. State
579 So. 2d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Cliburn v. State
510 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)