Rozer v. May
This text of 43 App. D.C. 103 (Rozer v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Siiepard delivered the opinion of the Court:
The statement of the evidence in this case having heretofore, by order of the court, been stricken from the record, the appellee, Henry May, moved to affirm the decree.
It appears that the cause was heard in the court below upon evidence in support of the bill and answers. Not being in the record,, it must be presumed that it supported the decree.
,The decree is therefore affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 App. D.C. 103, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rozer-v-may-cadc-1915.