Rozenberg v. Retrieval Methods, Inc.
722 N.W.2d 838, 477 Mich. 914
Opinion
Mark ROZENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RETRIEVAL METHODS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Edward Giebel, and John Kravetz, Defendants-Appellees, and
Retrieval Methods, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Stanley Ray, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rozenberg v. Retrieval Methods, Inc., 722 N.W.2d 838, 477 Mich. 914 (Mich. 2006).
722 N.W.2d 838 (Rozenberg v. Retrieval Methods, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.