Rozenberg v. Retrieval Methods, Inc.
722 N.W.2d 838, 477 Mich. 914
This text of 722 N.W.2d 838 (Rozenberg v. Retrieval Methods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rozenberg v. Retrieval Methods, Inc., 722 N.W.2d 838, 477 Mich. 914 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Mark ROZENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RETRIEVAL METHODS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Edward Giebel, and John Kravetz, Defendants-Appellees, and
Retrieval Methods, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Stanley Ray, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 N.W.2d 838, 477 Mich. 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rozenberg-v-retrieval-methods-inc-mich-2006.