Rozbicki v. Huybrechts

580 A.2d 59, 216 Conn. 812, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 354
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 18, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 580 A.2d 59 (Rozbicki v. Huybrechts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rozbicki v. Huybrechts, 580 A.2d 59, 216 Conn. 812, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 354 (Colo. 1990).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 131, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Does the plaintiff’s absence from voir dire in a civil trial require a new trial absent a showing of prejudice?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rozbicki v. Huybrechts
589 A.2d 363 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 A.2d 59, 216 Conn. 812, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rozbicki-v-huybrechts-conn-1990.