Roza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Roza v. State

466 S.W.2d 768, 1971 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1831

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 19, 1971

DocketNo. 44076

StatusPublished

This text of 466 S.W.2d 768 (Roza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roza v. State, 466 S.W.2d 768, 1971 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1831 (Tex. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is possession of heroin; the punishment upon a plea of guilty before the court, five (5) years.

There is neither a transcription of the court reporter’s notes nor any bill of exception. There does appear in the record a written stipulation, signed by appellant and approved in writing by both his attorney and the trial court, which is sufficient to support the conviction. Art. 1.15, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Bell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 455 S.W.2d 230. Appellant expressly declined the appointment of counsel on appeal, stating that he desired counsel of his own choice.

There is no issue of indigency.

All proceedings appearing regular, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI