Roytman, M. v. Cesarone, K.
This text of Roytman, M. v. Cesarone, K. (Roytman, M. v. Cesarone, K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MICHAEL ROYTMAN, : No. 166 MAL 2017 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : KAREN CESARONE, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Petition to File Appeal Response Nunc Pro Tunc is denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roytman, M. v. Cesarone, K., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roytman-m-v-cesarone-k-pa-2017.