Royster v. City of New York
This text of 26 A.D.3d 234 (Royster v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered November 3, 2004, which, inter alia, granted defendant City of New York’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The complaint was properly dismissed as against the City in the absence of evidence that the City received prior written notice of the alleged roadway defect (Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c] [2]; see Katz v City of New York, 87 NY2d 241, 243 [1995]). Contrary to plaintiffs suggestion, the action was not dismissed against the City for failure to file a notice of claim. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 234, 808 N.Y.S.2d 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royster-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2006.