Royster v. . Burwell
This text of 90 N.C. 24 (Royster v. . Burwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was judgment in behalf of the plaintiff. 41 From which judgment-defendants appealed to the supreme court; notice waived; bond in the sum of $25 adjudged sufficient; by consent, defendants allowed till Vance superior court to file bond and make up case.” This entry on the record is signed by the judge presiding.
No statement of the ease on appeal accompanies the record. The bond sent up is without justification and was not filed until after Vance court. Upon these grounds the plaintiff’s counsel moved in this court to dismiss the appeal, and the motion is sustained. Adams v. Reeves, 74 N. C., 106; Smith v. Abrams, at this term ; Bryson v. Lucas, 85 N. C., 397; Sever v. McLaughlin, 82 N. C., 332., The Code, §560, and the numerous cases there cited.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 N.C. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royster-v-burwell-nc-1884.