Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Royse v. City of Dayton

Royse v. City of Dayton

2012 Ohio 2574, 132 Ohio St. 3d 125
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 13, 2012
Docket2011-1477
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2012 Ohio 2574 (Royse v. City of Dayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royse v. City of Dayton, 2012 Ohio 2574, 132 Ohio St. 3d 125 (Ohio 2012).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. *126 Thompson Hiñe, L.L.P., and Terry Posey Jr.; and Terry Posey, for appellee. John J. Danish, Dayton City Attorney, and Jonathan W. Croft and Norma Dickens, Assistant City Attorneys, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Alexandra T. Schimmer, Solicitor General, and Michael J. Hendershot, Chief Deputy Counsel, for amicus curiae state of Ohio. Ice Miller L.L.P., Stephen L. Byron, and Rebecca K. Schaltenbrand; and John Gotherman, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Municipal League.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crum v. Huber Hts.
2013 Ohio 3271 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 2574, 132 Ohio St. 3d 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royse-v-city-of-dayton-ohio-2012.