Roys System Co. v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roys System Co. v. Rogers

115 A.D. 908, 101 N.Y.S. 1142

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D. 908 (Roys System Co. v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roys System Co. v. Rogers, 115 A.D. 908, 101 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

The contract of October 16, 1905, was a merger of defendants’ claim for improper installation prior to tliat time; the contract provided exclusively what should be done by plaintiff thereafter to satisfy defendants; the admission of evidence-over plaintiff’s objection as to the insufficiency .of the work before October sixteenth was, therefore, error, and the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Yfoodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The contract of October 16, 1905, was a merger of defendants’ claim for improper installation prior to tliat time; the contract provided exclusively what should be done by plaintiff thereafter to satisfy defendants; the admission of evidence-over plaintiff’s objection as to the insufficiency .of the work before October sixteenth was, therefore, error, and the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Yfoodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D. 908, 101 N.Y.S. 1142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roys-system-co-v-rogers-nyappdiv-1906.