Roylin Beale v. Deputy Madigan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roylin Beale v. Deputy Madigan. Read the opinion of the Court — 668 F. App'x 448
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2014·No. 14-7394·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7394

ROYLIN JUNIUS BEALE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPUTY J. P. MADIGAN; OFFICER R. BLOW; OFFICER HARLESS; OFFICER PEELE; OFFICER CORPREW,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CAPTAIN PHILLIPS, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:11-ct-03244-F)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roylin Junius Beale, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, PA, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roylin Junius Beale appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beale v. Madigan, No. 5:11-ct-03244-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roylin Beale v. Deputy Madigan, (4th Cir. 2014).

Roylin Beale v. Deputy Madigan (Roylin Beale v. Deputy Madigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related