Roylin Beale v. Deputy Madigan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7394
ROYLIN JUNIUS BEALE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY J. P. MADIGAN; OFFICER R. BLOW; OFFICER HARLESS; OFFICER PEELE; OFFICER CORPREW,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CAPTAIN PHILLIPS, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:11-ct-03244-F)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roylin Junius Beale, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, PA, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roylin Junius Beale appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beale v. Madigan, No. 5:11-ct-03244-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roylin Beale v. Deputy Madigan (Roylin Beale v. Deputy Madigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.