Royles v. Norton

62 P. 1120, 36 Or. 603, 1899 Ore. LEXIS 101
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 22, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 62 P. 1120 (Royles v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royles v. Norton, 62 P. 1120, 36 Or. 603, 1899 Ore. LEXIS 101 (Or. 1899).

Opinion

No trial fee haying been paid and no one appearing for appellant at the time set for hearing, the judgment was affirmed on motion of respondent. No opinion.

Affirmed .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 P. 1120, 36 Or. 603, 1899 Ore. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royles-v-norton-or-1899.