Royle v. State
This text of 258 S.E.2d 921 (Royle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was indicted for the offenses of driving under the influence, reckless driving and speeding. Defendant appeals, pro se, the judgment of the trial court entered in accordance with a jury verdict of guilty on all counts. We affirm.
As appellant has failed to present argument or authorities in support of his contentions of error, such *89 contentions are deemed abandoned. Terrell v. State, 138 Ga. App. 74 (5) (225 SE2d 470).
We have nonetheless reviewed the judgment on the general grounds. As there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict of guilty (on all counts), we must affirm the judgment of the court below. Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147 (1) (223 SE2d 131).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 S.E.2d 921, 151 Ga. App. 88, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royle-v-state-gactapp-1979.