Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Royle v. State

Royle v. State

258 S.E.2d 921, 151 Ga. App. 88, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2437
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 4, 1979·No. 57725·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant was indicted for the offenses of driving under the influence, reckless driving and speeding. Defendant appeals, pro se, the judgment of the trial court entered in accordance with a jury verdict of guilty on all counts. We affirm.

As appellant has failed to present argument or authorities in support of his contentions of error, such *89 contentions are deemed abandoned. Terrell v. State, 138 Ga. App. 74 (5) (225 SE2d 470).

Argued April 11, 1979 Decided September 4, 1979 Vincent M. Royle, pro se. Herbert A. Rivers, Solicitor, for appellee.

We have nonetheless reviewed the judgment on the general grounds. As there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict of guilty (on all counts), we must affirm the judgment of the court below. Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147 (1) (223 SE2d 131).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royle v. State, 258 S.E.2d 921, 151 Ga. App. 88, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2437 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

258 S.E.2d 921 (Royle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClure v. State
293 S.E.2d 496 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Fletcher v. State
285 S.E.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Thomas v. Property Bankers, Inc.
274 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Horne v. State
273 S.E.2d 193 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)