Roylan Camejo Naranjo v. State of Florida Department of Revenue

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 2025
Docket3D2025-0523
StatusPublished

This text of Roylan Camejo Naranjo v. State of Florida Department of Revenue (Roylan Camejo Naranjo v. State of Florida Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roylan Camejo Naranjo v. State of Florida Department of Revenue, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed September 17, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-0523 Lower Tribunal Nos. 2001419029, 13240016098FC & 25-000432CS ________________

Roylan Camejo Naranjo, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida Department of Revenue, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from State of Florida, Division of Administrative Hearings.

Roylan Camejo Naranjo, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Sarah C. Prieto, Assistant Attorney General (Fort Lauderdale), for Florida Department of Revenue.

Before SCALES, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Roylan Camejo Naranjo appeals a Final Administrative Support Order

rendered by the State of Florida Department of Revenue on February 27, 2025, following a hearing before the Division of Administrative Hearings. He

did not, however, take the steps necessary to provide this Court with a

transcript of the hearing. In the absence of such a record, we are constrained

to affirm unless the order under review reflects reversible error on its face,

which it does not. See, e.g., Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377

So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (noting that the burden is on the appellant to

demonstrate error and, without a transcript, the appellate court cannot

conclude whether the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence

or alternative theory); Loundin v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 208 So. 3d

789, 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (same). Therefore, we affirm the order under

review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Loundin v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
208 So. 3d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roylan Camejo Naranjo v. State of Florida Department of Revenue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roylan-camejo-naranjo-v-state-of-florida-department-of-revenue-fladistctapp-2025.