Royer v. Tate
1 Pen. & W. 227
This text of 1 Pen. & W. 227 (Royer v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Royer v. Tate, 1 Pen. & W. 227 (Pa. 1829).
Opinion
This appeal must be quashed. There is yet no final decree. The Court of Common Pleas must have all the parties before them, and dispose of the whole fund. This must be done to make a final decree. . Appeal quashed.
NOTE — Rogers, J., was sitting at-vVm Prius in Philadelphia, during this adjourned court, and took no part in the judgments given at it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Pen. & W. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royer-v-tate-pa-1829.