Royer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
This text of Royer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Royer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
RANDALL TODD ROYER
Plaintiff,
v. l:10-cv-0146 (LMB/IDD)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS L Defendant. NOV I 9 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA
Before the Court is the defendant's Motion to Dismiss or for
Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 23]. For the reasons discussed below,
the Court finds that venue is improper in the Eastern District of
Virginia. Accordingly, the Court will not address the Motion to
Dismiss but will transfer this civil action to the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia.
I. Background
This is a civil action against the Federal Bureau of Prisons
("BOP"), an agency of the United States Department of Justice, located in the District of Columbia. The pro se plaintiff, Randall Todd Royer, also known as Ismail Royer, is a federal inmate in the
custody of the BOP. On January 16, 2004, Royer pled guilty before this Court to one count of aiding and abetting the use and discharge of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence (conspiracy to violate the Neutrality Act), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(2) & 3238, and one count of aiding and abetting the carrying of an explosive during the commission of a
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Royer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royer-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-dcd-2010.