Royce Watch Co. v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 309, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1019
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1951
DocketNo. 55848; protest 170125-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 309 (Royce Watch Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royce Watch Co. v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 309, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1019 (cusc 1951).

Opinion

[310]*310Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise in question consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of United States v. Helbros Watch Co. et al. (38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the merchandise was held properly dutiable at the base rate of $1.20 each as watch movements more than %o of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Cust. Ct. 309, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royce-watch-co-v-united-states-cusc-1951.