Royce v. Ziegfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Royce v. Ziegfeld

222 A.D. 694

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1927

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 A.D. 694 (Royce v. Ziegfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Royce v. Ziegfeld, 222 A.D. 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Order appointing a receiver and enjoining defendants reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The action is one at law and the facts do not entitle the plaintiff to a receiver. (O’Mahoney v. Belmont, 62 N. Y. 133, 142; Central Union Trust Co. v. Northern Insurance Co., 217 App. Div. 482, 487; Mack v. Stanley, 74 id. 145; Civ. Prac. Act, § 974.) Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., concurs in result; Hagarty, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order appointing a receiver and enjoining defendants reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The action is one at law and the facts do not entitle the plaintiff to a receiver. (O’Mahoney v. Belmont, 62 N. Y. 133, 142; Central Union Trust Co. v. Northern Insurance Co., 217 App. Div. 482, 487; Mack v. Stanley, 74 id. 145; Civ. Prac. Act, § 974.) Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., concurs in result; Hagarty, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royce-v-ziegfeld-nyappdiv-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack