Royce v. Bonta
This text of Royce v. Bonta (Royce v. Bonta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SARA ROYCE; SARAH CLARK; Case No.: 3:23-cv-02012-H-BLM TIFFANY BROWN; and KRISTI 13 CARAWAY, ORDER REQUESTING PARTIES BE 14 PREPARED TO ADDRESS SECOND Plaintiffs, CIRCUIT CASE AT HEARING 15 v. 16 TOMÁS ARAGÓN, in his official 17 capacity as the State Public Health Officer, 18 Defendant. 19
20 21 On December 20, 2024, Plaintiffs Sara Royce, Sarah Clark, Tiffany Brown, and 22 Kristi Caraway filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) against Defendant Tomás 23 Aragón. (Doc. No. 48.) On January 10, 2025, Defendant Aragón filed a motion to dismiss 24 the TAC. (Doc. No. 50.) A hearing on Defendant’s motion is currently set for March 10, 25 2025, at 1:30 p.m. (Doc. No. 56.) 26 On March 3, 2025, the Second Circuit issued a decision in the case Miller v. 27 McDonald, __ F. 4th __, 2025 WL 665102 (2d Cir. 2025), involving a free exercise 28 challenge to a school immunization law. The Court requests that the parties be prepared 1 || to discuss Miller v. McDonald at the hearing scheduled for March 10, 2025. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 ||DATED: March 5, 2025 I |. JI { fd 5 MARILYN L. HUFF, District J 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Royce v. Bonta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royce-v-bonta-casd-2025.