ROYCE GOLDSMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ROYCE GOLDSMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ROYCE GOLDSMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ROYCE GOLDSMITH, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Nos. 4D18-3446 and 4D19-792
[July 10, 2019]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 08-2288 CF10A, 09-6184 CF10A and 11-17276 CF10A.
Royce Peter Goldsmith, Arcadia, pro se.
No appearance required by appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007) (“[F]or motions filed under rule 3.800(a), we hold that if the trial court could have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet, any error was harmless.”).
WARNER, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ROYCE GOLDSMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royce-goldsmith-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.