Royalty v. Winchester Bank
This text of 264 S.W.2d 657 (Royalty v. Winchester Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for an appeal from a judgment dismissing Royalty’s claim to $992.41 asserted under an alleged landlord’s lien on the 1950 tobacco crop of his tenant, Louis Hagar, and awarding the Winchester Bank, Inc., a first lien asserted under its mortgage on the crop and therefore entitled to recover the above amount. The evidence discloses Royalty did not have a landlord’s lien within the meaning of KRS 383.110(1). Moreover, the misjoinder of causes of action complained of did not deprive Royalty [658]*658of any substantial right nor in any way militate against his claim.
The motion is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 S.W.2d 657, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royalty-v-winchester-bank-kyctapp-1954.