Royalty v. Winchester Bank
Opinion
Motion for an appeal from a judgment dismissing Royalty’s claim to $992.41 asserted under an alleged landlord’s lien on the 1950 tobacco crop of his tenant, Louis Hagar, and awarding the Winchester Bank, Inc., a first lien asserted under its mortgage on the crop and therefore entitled to recover the above amount. The evidence discloses Royalty did not have a landlord’s lien within the meaning of KRS 383.110(1). Moreover, the misjoinder of causes of action complained of did not deprive Royalty [658] of any substantial right nor in any way militate against his claim.
The motion is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
264 S.W.2d 657 (Royalty v. Winchester Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.