Royal Weaving Co. v. Prince

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Royal Weaving Co. v. Prince

137 A.D. 909, 122 N.Y.S. 1143

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the words ‘.‘and further specifying the hour and minute when the said alleged repudiation, notification and direction were made, and the hour and minute when the said tender was made, as nearly as the same can be stated,” and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the words ‘.‘and further specifying the hour and minute when the said alleged repudiation, notification and direction were made, and the hour and minute when the said tender was made, as nearly as the same can be stated,” and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Royal Weaving Co. v. Prince, 137 A.D. 909, 122 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

137 A.D. 909 (Royal Weaving Co. v. Prince) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.