Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Royal v. State

Royal v. State

634 So. 2d 827, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3819, 1994 WL 138338
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 1994
DocketNo. 93-3332
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 634 So. 2d 827 (Royal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal v. State, 634 So. 2d 827, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3819, 1994 WL 138338 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed. However, we remand to the trial court to correct a clerical error in the sentence form [828]*828to reflect that Appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere.

STONE, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arroyo v. State
651 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
634 So. 2d 827, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3819, 1994 WL 138338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.