Royal v. State

634 So. 2d 827, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3819, 1994 WL 138338
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1994·No. No. 93-3332·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed. However, we remand to the trial court to correct a clerical error in the sentence form [828] to reflect that Appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere.

STONE, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal v. State, 634 So. 2d 827, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3819, 1994 WL 138338 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

634 So. 2d 827 (Royal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arroyo v. State
651 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)