Royal v. Royal

123 P.2d 799, 168 Or. 432, 1942 Ore. LEXIS 30
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided March 19, 1942·Published

Opinion

BELT, J.

This is a divorce proceeding wherein both parties seek dissolution of the bonds of matrimony. Each charges the other with cruel and inhuman treatment. The circuit court awarded plaintiff a decree of divorce; adjudicated that she was the owner of certain personal property in which defendant asserted ownership ; and restored to plaintiff her former name, Myrtle H. Rand. There was no award of alimony nor attorney fees. Defendant appeals.

*433 The voluminous record in this case has been considered and it is clear that the decree of the lower court is supported by the preponderance of the evidence. We think it is kindness to the parties involved not to comment upon the evidence. To do so would not give comfort to the defendant nor add to the learning of the legal profession.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal v. Royal, 123 P.2d 799, 168 Or. 432, 1942 Ore. LEXIS 30 (Or. 1942).

123 P.2d 799 (Royal v. Royal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.