Royal v. Bhagirdath

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6066

JARICE ROYAL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BHAGIRDATH, Sergeant, Supervisor; M. K. RIGGAN, Lieutenant; LANSEN, MJO; P. WILLIAMS, Ms., MJO; P. L. P. ROBBINS, Ms./Mr.; CAPTAIN HATCHETT, Ms.; ASS, Ms./Mr.; M. POLLARD, Superintendent, Lt. Col.; SERGEANT JOHNSON, Mr.; E. TAYLOR, Major, Mr.; JOHNSON, MJO, Mr.; MURPHY, MJO, Mr.; MADISON, Sergeant, Mr.; IMMANUEL, Nurse, Ms.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00835-GBL-JFA)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jarice Royal, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jarice Royal appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Royal v. Bhagirdath, No. 1:09-cv-00835-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va.

Dec. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED