Royal v. Armstrong

543 S.E.2d 495, 351 N.C. 474
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 6, 2000
DocketNo. 106P00
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 543 S.E.2d 495 (Royal v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal v. Armstrong, 543 S.E.2d 495, 351 N.C. 474 (N.C. 2000).

Opinion

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 2000.

Justices Orr and Martin recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howse v. Bank of Am., N.A.
804 S.E.2d 552 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Rolan v. N.C. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services
756 S.E.2d 788 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
Cobb Ex Rel. Knight v. Town of Blowing Rock
713 S.E.2d 732 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Michael v. Huffman Oil Co., Inc.
661 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 S.E.2d 495, 351 N.C. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-v-armstrong-nc-2000.