Royal Thai Gov't v. United States

2004 CIT 124
United States Court of International Trade·Decided October 1, 2004·No. Consol. 02-00026·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 04-124

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: HONORABLE RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, SENIOR JUDGE

ROYAL THAI GOVERNMENT, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES, Consol. Court No. 02-00026

Defendant,

and

UNITED STATES STEEL CORP.,

Defendant-Intervenor.

JUDGMENT ORDER

Upon consideration of the Final Results of Redetermination on Remand (Sept. 15, 2004) (“Redetermination Results”) filed by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) pursuant to the Court’s decision in Royal Thai Government v. United States, Slip Op. 04-91 (July 27, 2004), and all other papers filed herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that Commerce’s findings in the Redetermination Results that “the total estimated net countervailing subsidy rate [is] de minimis” and “[w]ith this change . . . no countervailable subsidies are being provided to the production or exportation of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from Thailand” are sustained.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Richard W. Goldberg Richard W. Goldberg Senior Judge

Date: October 1, 2004 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal Thai Gov't v. United States, 2004 CIT 124 (cit 2004).

2004 CIT 124 (Royal Thai Gov't v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Royal Thai Government v. United States
436 F.3d 1330 (Federal Circuit, 2006)