Royal Thai Government v. United States

28 Ct. Int'l Trade 1635
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Royal Thai Government v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 441 F. Supp. 2d 1350
United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 1, 2004·No. Consol. Court No. 02-00026·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:

Upon consideration of the Final Results of Redetermination on Remand (Sept. 15, 2004) (“Redetermination Results”) filed by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) pursuant to the Court’s decision in Royal Thai Government v. United States, Slip Op. 04-91 (July 27, 2004), and all other papers filed herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that Commerce’s findings in the Redetermination Results that “the total estimated net countervailing subsidy rate [is] de minimis” and “[w]ith this change ... no countervailable subsidies are being provided to the production or exportation of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from Thailand” are sustained.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal Thai Government v. United States, 28 Ct. Int'l Trade 1635 (cit 2004).

28 Ct. Int'l Trade 1635 (Royal Thai Government v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.