ROYAL PALM CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER, P.A. a/a/o EMILY HANSEN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
This text of ROYAL PALM CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER, P.A. a/a/o EMILY HANSEN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (ROYAL PALM CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER, P.A. a/a/o EMILY HANSEN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ROYAL PALM CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER, P.A. a/a/o EMILY HANSEN, Appellant,
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4D21-148
[July 14, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteen Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 50-2017-SC- 009430-XXXX-MB and 50-2019-AP-000085-CAXX-MB.
Jonathan Phillips of Florida Litigators, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Michael A. Rosenberg, Peter D. Weinstein and Adrianna de la Cruz- Muñoz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Based on our decision in Geico Indemnity Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic P.A., No. 4D21-457, 2021 WL 2584107 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021), we reverse the final judgment in favor of Geico and remand for the entry of a final judgment in favor of appellant in the amount of $1.22.
Reversed and remanded.
GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ROYAL PALM CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER, P.A. a/a/o EMILY HANSEN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-palm-chiropractic-rehab-center-pa-aao-emily-hansen-v-fladistctapp-2021.