Royal Oil Co. v. Hooks

138 S.E.2d 442, 110 Ga. App. 309, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 613
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Royal Oil Co. v. Hooks. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 Ga. App. 779
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 22, 1964·No. 40937·Published

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

Since the dismissal of an answer on demurrer is not such a final disposition of a cause as may be reviewed by this court, Williams v. Kwik Shake Dispenser Mfg. Co., 214 Ga. 478 (105 SE2d 457), Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 230, Code Ann., § 6-701, the overruling of a demurrer to an answer “if it had been rendered as claimed by plaintiff in error” would not have been a final disposition of the cause. Bello v. Milholland, 216 Ga. 162 (2) (115 SE2d 531). It follows, therefore, that the bill of exceptions brought by the plaintiff in the present case, assigning error on the overruling of demurrers to the answer of the defendant, must be

Dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal Oil Co. v. Hooks, 138 S.E.2d 442, 110 Ga. App. 309, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964).

138 S.E.2d 442 (Royal Oil Co. v. Hooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bello v. Milholland
115 S.E.2d 531 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Williams v. KWIK SHAKE DISPENSER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
105 S.E.2d 457 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)