Royal Med. Supply, Inc. v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedSeptember 22, 2017
Docket2017 NYSlipOp 51235(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Royal Med. Supply, Inc. v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co. (Royal Med. Supply, Inc. v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal Med. Supply, Inc. v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion



Royal Medical Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Salvayra Dalmasi, Appellant,

against

Nationwide General Insurance Company, Respondent.


Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Douglas Mace, Esq.), for appellant. Epstein, Gialleonardo, Harms & McDonald (Yael Ryzowy, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered February 14, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).

Contrary to plaintiff's argument on appeal, the proof submitted by defendant in support of its motion was sufficient to demonstrate that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for the EUOs (see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 35 AD3d 720 [2006]). Moreover, plaintiff's arguments on appeal as to defendant's proof of mailing of the EUO scheduling letters and the denial of claim forms lack merit.

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: September 22, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
35 A.D.3d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Royal Med. Supply, Inc. v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-med-supply-inc-v-nationwide-gen-ins-co-nyappterm-2017.