Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Royal Mansion Condominium Ass'n v. City of Cape Canaveral

Royal Mansion Condominium Ass'n v. City of Cape Canaveral

665 So. 2d 1161, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 121, 1996 WL 11010
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 12, 1996·No. No. 95-519·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Council Bros v. City of Tallahassee, 634 So.2d 264, 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (holding that party seeking to invoke doctrine of estoppel against governmental entity must show not only usual elements of estoppel, but affirmative conduct of governmental entity that goes beyond mere negligence); see also Dolphin Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transp., 582 So.2d 709, 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

DAUKSCH, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal Mansion Condominium Ass'n v. City of Cape Canaveral, 665 So. 2d 1161, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 121, 1996 WL 11010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

665 So. 2d 1161 (Royal Mansion Condominium Ass'n v. City of Cape Canaveral) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dolphin Outdoor Advertising v. DOT
582 So. 2d 709 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Council Bros. v. City of Tallahassee
634 So. 2d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)