Royal Insurance Companies v. State, Oregon Transportation Commission, Highway Division

691 P.2d 915, 71 Or. App. 221, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4611
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 28, 1984·No. 16-83-03206; CA A29388·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff brought this action against the state for contribution or indemnity for sums paid in settlement on behalf of its insured for personal injuries sustained by two claimants. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting the state’s motion to dismiss its complaint for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim for relief. This case was consolidated for argument with Scovell v. TRK Trans, Inc., 71 Or App 186, 691 P2d 911 (1984), in which we concluded that the third-party plaintiff was entitled to maintain its action for contribution. The parties agree that the issues presented here are identical to those considered in Scovell.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal Insurance Companies v. State, Oregon Transportation Commission, Highway Division, 691 P.2d 915, 71 Or. App. 221, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4611 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

691 P.2d 915 (Royal Insurance Companies v. State, Oregon Transportation Commission, Highway Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beaver v. Pelett
705 P.2d 1149 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)