Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Vene-Embarques, Inc.
This text of 453 So. 2d 500 (Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Vene-Embarques, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action brought pursuant to an open marine cargo insurance policy, there was competent, substantial evidence to support the judgment finding coverage and awarding damages to plaintiff. See Peninsular Fire Insurance Co. v. Wells, 438 So.2d 46, 53 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 443 So.2d 980 (1983); Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flitman, 234 So.2d 390, 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); see generally Hillcrea Export & Import Co. v. Universal Insurance Co., 110 F.Supp. 204, (S.D.N.Y.1953), aff'd, 212 F.2d 206 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 834, 75 S.Ct. 57, 99 L.Ed. 657 (1954) (question of whether or not loss is within terms of marine cargo insurance policy is one of fact). The judgment under review is therefore
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 So. 2d 500, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1686, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-insurance-co-of-america-v-vene-embarques-inc-fladistctapp-1984.