Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Vene-Embarques, Inc.

453 So. 2d 500, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1686, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14177
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1984·No. No. 83-2306·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action brought pursuant to an open marine cargo insurance policy, there was competent, substantial evidence to support the judgment finding coverage and awarding damages to plaintiff. See Peninsular Fire Insurance Co. v. Wells, 438 So.2d 46, 53 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 443 So.2d 980 (1983); Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flitman, 234 So.2d 390, 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); see generally Hillcrea Export & Import Co. v. Universal Insurance Co., 110 F.Supp. 204, (S.D.N.Y.1953), aff'd, 212 F.2d 206 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 834, 75 S.Ct. 57, 99 L.Ed. 657 (1954) (question of whether or not loss is within terms of marine cargo insurance policy is one of fact). The judgment under review is therefore

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Vene-Embarques, Inc., 453 So. 2d 500, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1686, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 500 (Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Vene-Embarques, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Flitman
234 So. 2d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Peninsular Fire Ins. Co. v. Wells
438 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Hillcrea Export & Import Co. v. Universal Ins. Co.
110 F. Supp. 204 (S.D. New York, 1953)