Royal Indemnity Company v. Maloney Concrete Company
This text of 263 F.2d 902 (Royal Indemnity Company v. Maloney Concrete Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
263 F.2d 902
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY et al., Appellants,
v.
MALONEY CONCRETE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 14667.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued January 28, 1959.
Decided February 12, 1959.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; John D. Martin, Sr., Judge.
Mr. James C. Gregg, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Hugh Lynch, Jr. and Charles E. Channing, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. J. Harry Welch, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. H. Mason Welch, J. Joseph Barse, Arthur V. Butler and Walter J. Murphy, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Royal Indemnity Company, suing to its own use and to the use of another upon alleged negligence said to have caused personal injury, appeals from a verdict directed in favor of defendant at the close of plaintiff's case. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 F.2d 902, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 65, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-indemnity-company-v-maloney-concrete-company-cadc-1959.