Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. G. White Engineering Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. G. White Engineering Corp.

214 A.D. 753

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1925·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Travelers Ins. Co. v. Brass Goods Mfg. Co. (239 N. Y. 273), which has settled the law upon the question of the right of the plaintiff to recover the full amount of damages suffered by the injured party. The alleged error in the charge of the court and the statement of the plaintiff’s counsel made in reliance upon the language in the opinion in Casualty Co. of America v. Swett Electric L. & Power Co. (174 App. Div. 825), do not justify a reversal, it not being claimed that the verdict is excessive. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Sears and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Travelers Ins. Co. v. Brass Goods Mfg. Co. (239 N. Y. 273), which has settled the law upon the question of the right of the plaintiff to recover the full amount of damages suffered by the injured party. The alleged error in the charge of the court and the statement of the plaintiff’s counsel made in reliance upon the language in the opinion in Casualty Co. of America v. Swett Electric L. & Power Co. (174 App. Div. 825), do not justify a reversal, it not being claimed that the verdict is excessive. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Sears and Taylor, JJ.

Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. G. White Engineering Corp., 214 A.D. 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

214 A.D. 753 (Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. G. White Engineering Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related