Royal Highlanders v. Louthan

243 N.W. 267, 123 Neb. 469, 1932 Neb. LEXIS 220
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1932
DocketNo. 28239
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 243 N.W. 267 (Royal Highlanders v. Louthan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal Highlanders v. Louthan, 243 N.W. 267, 123 Neb. 469, 1932 Neb. LEXIS 220 (Neb. 1932).

Opinion

Horth, District Judge.

The defendants, James H. Louthan and Mary L. Louthan, appeal from an order of the district court for Banner county confirming the sale of a section of land, under a decree of foreclosure. The errors alleged and relied upon by the appellants are: (1) The court erred in finding that the property sold for its fair and reasonable value under the circumstances and conditions of the sale; and (2) the court erred in finding that the property would not realize a greater amount at a second sale.

The burden of proof is upon the appellants to show affirmatively that the judgment of the trial court was erroneous. The evidence on the question of the value of the land was by way of affidavits and these are not convincing that the amount for which the land sold under the circumstances and conditions of' the sale was so inadequate as to make it appear that it was the result of fraud or mistake. On the question of whether a greater amount would be realized at a second sale, appellants’ evidence is silent.

The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed, with leave to appellants to redeem before the mandate is issued.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Battery Co. v. Levy
126 F.2d 33 (Eighth Circuit, 1942)
Howells State Bank v. Hardes
253 N.W. 410 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 N.W. 267, 123 Neb. 469, 1932 Neb. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-highlanders-v-louthan-neb-1932.