Royal Guard Fence Co. v. D & D Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Royal Guard Fence Co. v. D & D Construction Co.

82 A.D.2d 915, 441 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14631

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.2d 915 (Royal Guard Fence Co. v. D & D Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Royal Guard Fence Co. v. D & D Construction Co., 82 A.D.2d 915, 441 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Calabretta, J.), dated September 3, 1980, as denied its motion for summary judgment on the first two causes of action. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable to defendants D & D Construction Co. and Peerless Insurance Company. Triable issues of fact exist which preclude summary disposition (see Glick & Dolleck v Tri-Pac Export Corp., 22 NY2d 439). Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Calabretta, J.), dated September 3, 1980, as denied its motion for summary judgment on the first two causes of action. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable to defendants D & D Construction Co. and Peerless Insurance Company. Triable issues of fact exist which preclude summary disposition (see Glick & Dolleck v Tri-Pac Export Corp., 22 NY2d 439). Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 915, 441 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-guard-fence-co-v-d-d-construction-co-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack