Royal Globe Insurance v. Williams

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Royal Globe Insurance v. Williams

373 So. 2d 594, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 2822

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 29, 1979

DocketNo. 7020

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 373 So. 2d 594 (Royal Globe Insurance v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Royal Globe Insurance v. Williams, 373 So. 2d 594, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 2822 (La. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

SWIFT, Judge.

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated case bearing our docket No. 7019, entitled, “Viola Cassity v. James Williams, d/b/a Medi-Trans Ambulance Service, et al.”, 373 So.2d 586, the judgment appealed is affirmed insofar as: (1) the awards to the plaintiffs, Royal-Globe Insurance Company and Mark Thompson, and against the defendants, James Williams, d/b/a Medi-Trans Ambulance Service, Billy Williams and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, are concerned; (2) it dismissed the plaintiffs’ main demand against Viola Cassity and Hanover Insurance Company; and (3) it dismissed the third party demand of James Williams, d/b/a Medi-Trans Ambulance Service, Billy Williams and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company against Viola Cassity. Otherwise, said judgment is reversed and set aside and judgment is now rendered; (1) dismissing the plaintiffs’ main demand against Claude E. Hodnett, Catherine H. Hodnett and Government Employees Insurance Company; and (2) dismissing the third party demand of James Williams, d/b/a Medi-Trans Ambulance Service, Billy Williams and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company against Claude E. Hodnett, Catherine H. Hodnett, Government Employees Insurance Company and Martin W. Reid. All costs of the suit, including this appeal, are to be paid by the said third party plaintiffs.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SWIFT, Judge.

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated case bearing our docket No. 7019, entitled, “Viola Cassity v. James Williams, d/b/a Medi-Trans Ambulance Service, et al.”, 373 So.2d 586, the judgment appealed is affirmed insofar as: (1) the awards to the plaintiffs, Royal-Globe Insurance Company and Mark Thompson, and against the defendants, James Williams, d/b/a Medi-Trans Ambulance Service, Billy Williams and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, are concerned; (2) it dismissed the plaintiffs’ main demand against Viola Cassity and Hanover Insurance Company; and (3) it dismissed the third party demand of James Williams, d/b/a Medi-Trans Ambulance Service, Billy Williams and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company against Viola Cassity. Otherwise, said judgment is reversed and set aside and judgment is now rendered; (1) dismissing the plaintiffs’ main demand against Claude E. Hodnett, Catherine H. Hodnett and Government Employees Insurance Company; and (2) dismissing the third party demand of James Williams, d/b/a Medi-Trans Ambulance Service, Billy Williams and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company against Claude E. Hodnett, Catherine H. Hodnett, Government Employees Insurance Company and Martin W. Reid. All costs of the suit, including this appeal, are to be paid by the said third party plaintiffs.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND RENDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

373 So. 2d 594, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 2822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-globe-insurance-v-williams-lactapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack