Royal Globe Insurance v. Todd

323 S.E.2d 216, 172 Ga. App. 414, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2529
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 25, 1984
Docket69258
StatusPublished

This text of 323 S.E.2d 216 (Royal Globe Insurance v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal Globe Insurance v. Todd, 323 S.E.2d 216, 172 Ga. App. 414, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2529 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The appellee was injured in a collision while driving an automobile loaned to him by Coastal Chevrolet, Inc., for use while his own car was being repaired. Both the loaned vehicle and the appellee’s vehicle were covered by policies of automobile accident insurance issued by the appellant. The appellant paid the appellee $5,000 in PIP no-fault benefits from his own coverage, as compensation for medical expenses and lost wages resulting from the collision; and the appellee brought this action to recover an additional $4,000 in PIP benefits. We granted an interlocutory appeal from the denial of the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Held:

Although the appellee alleges in his amended complaint that each policy provided for $25,000 in optional no-fault benefits, the record shows without dispute that each policy provided only the basic coverage of $5,000. “[A]n individual may recover no more than $5,000 in basic PIP benefits for any one accident ‘regardless of the number of insurers providing such benefits or of the number of policies providing such coverage.’ Code Ann. § 56-3403b (b) (4) [OCGA § 33-34-4 (c)].” Gen. Accident Fire &c. Corp. v. Kelch, 158 Ga. App. 555 (1) (281 SE2d 258) (1981). See also Baron v. State Farm &c. Ins. Co., 157 Ga. App. 16 (276 SE2d 78) (1981); Ga. Cas. &c. Co. v. Waters, 146 Ga. App. 149 (246 SE2d 202) (1978). It follows that the appellee has received the maximum to which he is entitled.

Judgment reversed.

Pope and Benham, JJ., concur. [415]*415Decided September 25, 1984 Rehearing denied October 17, 1984 Richard A. Brown, Jr., John E. Bumgartner, for appellant. Edward E. Boshears, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Waters
246 S.E.2d 202 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Baron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
276 S.E.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD. v. Kelch
281 S.E.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 S.E.2d 216, 172 Ga. App. 414, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-globe-insurance-v-todd-gactapp-1984.