Royal Exchange Assurance v. Gilmore
89 S.E. 1047, 18 Ga. App. 515, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1078
Opinion
The petition as amended shows an absolute breach of the “iron-safe clause” by the insured after the insurance policies were completed by attaching that clause to them; and consequently the court erred in overruling the demurrer and refusing to dismiss, the petition. All after proceedings were nugatory, and therefore need not be considered. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Royal Exchange Assurance v. Gilmore, 89 S.E. 1047, 18 Ga. App. 515, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1078 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
89 S.E. 1047 (Royal Exchange Assurance v. Gilmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Firemen's Insurance Co. v. Hamby
17 S.E.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)