Royal Caterers, LLC v. Marine Midland
This text of 8 A.D.3d 549 (Royal Caterers, LLC v. Marine Midland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme [550]*550Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 29, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendant Leonard Weiner, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint for failing to comply with court-ordered discovery.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs’ repeated failure to comply with court-ordered discovery and their failure to timely pay monetary sanctions imposed was clearly willful, deliberate, and contumacious conduct. Thus, the Supreme Court, providently exercised its discretion in dismissing their complaint (see Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 120-123 [1999]; Russell v B&B Indus., 309 AD2d 914 [2003]; Vanalst v City of New York, 302 AD2d 515 [2003]). Florio, J.P., Luciano, Townes and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.3d 549, 778 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-caterers-llc-v-marine-midland-nyappdiv-2004.