Royal Castle System, Inc. v. Lockmiller

Supreme Court of Florida

Royal Castle System, Inc. v. Lockmiller

187 So. 2d 895, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3349

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 1966

DocketNo. 35288

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 895 (Royal Castle System, Inc. v. Lockmiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Royal Castle System, Inc. v. Lockmiller, 187 So. 2d 895, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3349 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 21, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate-Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

It is further ordered that a fee of $250.00' be awarded to the attorney for the respondent.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS,. DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL,. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI