Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd. v. Killen

920 So. 2d 701, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553, 2006 WL 288389
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 2006
DocketNo. 3D05-2528
StatusPublished

This text of 920 So. 2d 701 (Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd. v. Killen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd. v. Killen, 920 So. 2d 701, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553, 2006 WL 288389 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

CORTIÑAS, Judge.

As Respondent concedes that the accident reports at issue are protected as work product and are not discoverable absent a showing of need and inability to obtain the substantial equivalent without undue hardship, we dismiss the instant petition for a writ of certiorari. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(3); Intercontinental Properties, Inc. v. Samy, 685 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); DeBartolo-Aventura, Inc. v. Hernandez, 638 So.2d 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeBartolo-Aventura, Inc. v. Hernandez
638 So. 2d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
INTERCONTINENTAL PROPERTIES v. Samy
685 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 So. 2d 701, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553, 2006 WL 288389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-caribbean-cruise-lines-ltd-v-killen-fladistctapp-2006.