Royal Cadillac Service, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court

Royal Cadillac Service, Inc. v. United States

317 U.S. 595, 63 S. Ct. 158, 87 L. Ed. 487, 1942 U.S. LEXIS 1075

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 9, 1942

DocketNo. 423

StatusPublished

This text of 317 U.S. 595 (Royal Cadillac Service, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Royal Cadillac Service, Inc. v. United States, 317 U.S. 595, 63 S. Ct. 158, 87 L. Ed. 487, 1942 U.S. LEXIS 1075 (1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed, it appearing that the only substantial question raised by the appeal — whether under § 206 (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U. S. C., § 306 (a), appellants may lawfully [596]*596continue operation until the determination by the Commission of their application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity — has become moot because of the denial of such application by the Interstate Commerce Commission on September 16, 1942.

Mr. George H. Rosen for appellants. Solicitor General Faky and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al; Mr. Henry P. Goldstein for the Mountain Transit Corporation; and Mr. James F. X. O’Brien for the Hudson Transit Lines, — appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed, it appearing that the only substantial question raised by the appeal — whether under § 206 (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U. S. C., § 306 (a), appellants may lawfully [596]*596continue operation until the determination by the Commission of their application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity — has become moot because of the denial of such application by the Interstate Commerce Commission on September 16, 1942.

Mr. George H. Rosen for appellants. Solicitor General Faky and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al; Mr. Henry P. Goldstein for the Mountain Transit Corporation; and Mr. James F. X. O’Brien for the Hudson Transit Lines, — appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

317 U.S. 595, 63 S. Ct. 158, 87 L. Ed. 487, 1942 U.S. LEXIS 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-cadillac-service-inc-v-united-states-scotus-1942.