Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 F.4th 1250
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 4, 2023·No. 22-1226·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-1226 Document: 79 Page: 1 Filed: 08/04/2023

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

August 4, 2023

ERRATA ______________________

Appeal No. 2022-1226

ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, DIXON TICONDEROGA COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees ______________________

Decided: July 27, 2023 Precedential Opinion ______________________

Please make the following change: In the first sentence of the last paragraph on page 15, de- lete the word “not.” The corrected sentence should read: “The government nonetheless argues that confidential business information cannot be disclosed absent a statute or regulation authorizing a protective order.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2023).

Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States (Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.